Calling All True Men.

What would happen if a majority of the working class men went on a work strike for one day in the United States?

If a majority of working-class men in the United States stopped working for one day, the effect would be enormous—but it would depend heavily on which workers participated and how coordinated the strike was.

On the first day

Transportation would be disrupted. Trucking, freight, construction, warehouse operations, public transit, delivery services, and some airline operations could see major interruptions. Businesses would lose substantial productivity. Restaurants, factories, construction sites, logistics companies, retail operations, and other labor-intensive industries could have large numbers of absent workers.

Supply chains could seize up temporarily. A one-day interruption wouldn't necessarily create permanent shortages, but distribution bottlenecks could appear quickly, particularly for groceries, fuel, manufacturing inputs, and other goods that depend on continuous transportation.

Construction and industrial work could largely stop in participating workplaces. Some consequences would extend beyond the actual day because certain operations can't simply resume where they left off.

Financial markets might react strongly. Investors would likely interpret a genuinely nationwide, coordinated strike as a major political and economic event. The market reaction could range from a sharp decline to considerable volatility depending on expectations about whether the strike would continue.

Government officials would IMMEDIATELY respond. The White House, Congress, governors, and local governments would likely be under enormous pressure to address the reasons for the strike and prevent it from becoming longer.

But there's an important distinction

A one-day strike and a one-day absence would have very different political effects. If millions of men simply called out sick or stayed home individually, you'd have a huge economic disruption but relatively little unified political leverage. If millions deliberately participated in a coordinated general strike, with explicit demands and labor organizations supporting it, the political significance would be much greater. 

The message would essentially be

"A substantial portion of the country's productive workforce can collectively withdraw its labor."

That's historically one of the strongest forms of nonviolent economic leverage available to workers.

What wouldn't necessarily happen

The United States wouldn't suddenly "collapse" after 24 hours. The economy has inventories, automation, salaried workers, women workers, retirees, managers, contractors, and other mechanisms that would keep many essential functions operating.

And "working-class men" isn't a clean economic category. If you're imagining, for example, 50–60% of male blue-collar and lower-wage workers participating, the consequences would be very different from literally a majority of all employed men.

The really interesting question is what happens afterward

The first day would demonstrate capacity. The political bargaining power would come from what everyone believes happens on day two. If employers and government believed workers would return normally after one day, they might absorb the cost. If they believed workers could repeat the action—or escalate to two or three days—the economic calculation changes dramatically. Even the credible possibility of continued collective action could force negotiations.

There's also a major counter-effect: employers could attempt to use replacement workers, overtime, automation, legal injunctions, public pressure, or other measures to weaken the strike.

So in simplified terms:

1.) One day: enormous disruption and national attention.

2.) Several coordinated days: potentially severe economic consequences.

3.) A sustained, organized strike with clear demands: potentially a major political and economic crisis.

If you'd like, I can also estimate what would happen to U.S. GDP, transportation, food supply, stock markets, and government revenue if, say, 50% of working-class men actually participated for exactly 24 hours.

Ask ChatGPT 

There are a plethora of changes needed here to take the burden off the man. But let's name one example. No female can receive fifty percent of a man's property or receive alimony unless he violates his marriage oath. The amount of the award to any female should be predicated on the amount of years married. Example. If she marries you and two years later she wants to leave with half. We want a rule that allows her to receive a smaller one percent per year only after 10 years of marriage.

Here's another great idea. Marriage license should expire like a drivers license. Here are the benefits of this law.

1.) It gets rid of hiring divorce chasing lawyers and paying their goughing legal fees.

2.) It helps your decision to marry by giving you an option to seperate without a cost.

3.) It makes a person focus on their positon and place in the marriage to prevent the other person from defaulting on the agreement. Yearly licenses leave an escape route for those involved with sexless partners, cheaters, household deniers, financial renegers, and other unbecoming hidden traits that occur.

4.) A probationary period will also be assigned to be remarried to another individual. This promotes marriage-jumping for greener grass.

"Till death due us part," is not the rule of law anymore. They leave for any reason now. The rules have changed to assist them in an early departure. This small change in law levels the playing field with the leverage of not re-uping to the marriage. This promotes staying married. 

1.) Equal state and federal funding alloted for men to start small businesses matching the funds women receive. (Including schooling,daycare, and etc.)

2.) A standard amount to cap the child support payments in each state that is not determined by the amount we earn, but on the amount it takes to rear a child in each state. (If you are divorced by a woman in Arkansas and you are a multi-millionaire, that state's economy does not justify you having to pay $35,000 of child support if it only takes $1000 monthly to rear any child there.)

3.) Equal tax exemptions for future business owners comparable to those foreigners receive to open a business.

4.) Large corporations should begin to pay fifty percentage of our yearly federal IRS taxes if not the entire amount. This offsets the huge amount they profit and give to investors instead of investing in the workers.

These examples are nothing but a simple change in the laws and can all be put into action by our goverrnment easily. Send your ideas below.

We have a ton of things the goverment must rethink and change from taxaction to health insurance. Our demands must be met to re-empower us men because WE ARE the oil in the U.S. economical machine. Sign up below to become a part of the movement. If you want, you can send us your idea you want to see changed. All ideas are welcome and will be added to the list.